I’m writing this as the final stage is taking place, and I am assuming that all of the results are set in stone, save for the winner on the Champs Elysees. That being said, after yesterday’s time trial, I consider this a perfectly good time to reflect on the race this year.
This would be an appropriate time to offer my congratulations to Carlos Sastre. I realize that he was not one of the hot favorites, but I will say that I consider him to be a worthwhile champion. Sometimes, you win races by being agressive; other times you win by simply making no mistakes. I believe that both of these apply to Sastre. He was capably shepparded by his team when possible, and yet he was one of the few riders who was able to make a decisive move when it really counted (on l’Alpe d’Huez), and rode a time trial that was strong enough to defend his lead. He has been a solid professional for many years, always being close, but never really tasting the ultimately glory. I am very happy for him because he really seems to be a humble gentlemen, and has done nothing to tarnish the sport. Given the field this year, I will say that I consider him a worthy winner.
With this in mind, however, I will take this time to say that Sastre won a race that was devoid of superstars, and I would be surprised to see him win again next year. He made some good decisions, and obviously held some good form, and he deserves the accolades he will receive. With that being said, I would not put him on the same level of some of the Tour greats. This has been a competitive event, simply because of the parity of the field. I consider the peleton to be in a transition, in that they are searching for a patron, and right now, I only really see one obvious superstar in the current crop of Tour riders, and he wasn’t allowed to ride and defend his title. This gave a chance for a number of very good riders vie for the title, and I feel as though each one of them gave it a real shot. Unfortunately, this year also showed how when there is really only one dominant team, they can really dominate the field, and unfortunately no other team were capable of breaking their stranglehold on the race, or at least really willing to do so.
For a number of riders, I wonder if they will consider this year to be a wasted opportunity. For Cadel Evans, the pressure to win must have been enormous. He was the highest returning finisher, and with no Contador this year, he was the consensus pick to win the race. He came in with good form, and rode a tactically sound race. On paper, he really made no mistakes, perhaps except for allowing Sastre so much time on Alpe d’Huez, a stage where it would have been unlikely that he could have dragged his chase group all alone. His inability to win the race in the time trial yesterday showed that he really is not the great champion that this great race requires. It is conceivable that his early crash may have affected him, but I still felt as if he rode too cautiously, and waited for the race to come to him. He was also hampered by a lack of team support. He is a strong rider, solid in all disciplines, but I believe that he lacks the championship demeanor which allows him to put the stamp on the race, in the manor of many of the past great winners. He will still contend for another year or two, but I believe that his best opportunity has passed this year.
Denis Menchov also proved that he will never win the Tour de France, for similar reasons. He is solid in all areas of the sport, and has the ability to stay with the best riders in the world up in the mountains, and in the time trials. Unfortunately, he also showed an inability to attack the leaders, and gain the edge needed. He also showed a need to pay attention in the bunch, losing precious seconds on seemingly easy stages. His fourth place has got to seem like a disappointment of sort, in that his palmares would have suggested that he would be on the podium, at least.
I am not sure what to make of Alejandro Valverde. He may be one of the most talented cyclists in the world, and maybe, one day he will put it all together. He is still somewhat young, and very strong. I would consider this the first time he has really been picked as a real favorite, and I think that caused him to make some mistakes. He clearly wasted too much energy in the first week, chasing stages and carrying the yellow jersey. It was a good idea for his sponsors, but unfortunately it killed his overall chances. He seems like the type of rider who may always be prone to a bad day in the mountains, and he clearly needs to work on his time trialling. It is tough to say what his real limits are, because I believe now (as I did 3 weeks ago), that he held his best form in June, and he was really lacking the fortitude to hold it for the full Tour. He made his mark on this race, but I think that in the modern peleton, you have to base your early season all on winning the Tour, and not trying to be ultra-competitive throughout the spring and through June. Looking at the winners over the past 10-12 years, you will see that most of them have only tried to win the Tour, picking and choosing certain targets leading up to it, but never looking to peak for early season wins.
I don’t want to make it seem as though this Tour was without its stars; there were several riders who stepped forward, and it will be interesting to see if this was the year they started to blossom into the future champions, or if they are simply one year wonders who took advantage of a peleton without a real patron. Kim Kirchen showed that he is very much a strong rider, and I wonder how far he could go if he really decided to focus on the overall for the whole of the three weeks, rather than fighting for early glory. He ended up realy having a great race, with several days in both the green and the yellow jerseys, before folling back into the also-rans. He is a strong time-trialist, and a capable climber. I don’t know if he will ever win the race, but he seems like someone who will be a player in future editions.
I think the hype over the Schleck brothers is deserved. They are both very talented riders, and demonstrate the class of a possible champion. They both need to work on their time trialing (especially Frank), but their ability to attack in the mountains, and their willingness to be agressive, suggest that they have sufficient class to maybe one day win this race. I will go out on a limb and say that I believe that Andy Schleck may have a bit more of an upside than Frank, partially because of his youth, but also he seems to be a bit more of a complete rider. It is difficult to tell for certain, because he was a bit more saddled by team responsibilities, but I just get the sense that he may ultimately have a bit more of class, which might one day having fighting for the win.
While they didn’t get much credit, I thought that Bernhard Kohl and Stefan Schummacher from Gerolsteiner also had outstanding races. Kohl showed solid ability in the mountains, and demonstrated an ability to ride a solid time trial. I think that he benefited from not really being a favorite, and thus was given some freedom to gain time on a couple of mountain stages, but in the end, he had to defend his position, and getting on the podium showed that he basically rode a race that was free of mistakes. Schummacher is also an underrated rider, who is one of the best riders against the clock, and also no slouch in the mountains. I don’t think he will ever really contend for the race win, but I think he definitely made his mark, winning both time trials, as well as being a catalyst in the Alps.
THE AMERICANS
When considering the revelations of the race, the performance of Christian Vande Velde has to be very high up near the top of the list. I will say that he benefitted by not being saddled with any undue pressure, but he really only had one bad day, balancing it with fantastic rides in both the Pyrenees and the Alps, and he rode the best time trial of all the favorites on Saturday. It is disappointing to realize that without a crash on stage 16, he might have been riding for the win, or at least the podium, but then you have to remember that he really did exceed all expectations. This was a year when Americans were not supposed to be amongst the real players, and even I wrote back on Day One that without Astana (“America’s Team”), it would be harder to enjoy the race. I concede that I was wrong!!! Vande Velde rode with the heart of a champion, and demonstrated the experience gained from a decade in the peleton. I wonder how he will ride next year, when he may be more of a marked man, but in reality, he has demostrated that he has taken the next step towards being a great rider. I am not convinced that he was really targeted or otherwise limited; he simply rode with the best riders in the mountains, with limited team support, and showed that he has alot of class. A fifth place finish is a phenomenal achievement. His progress may be limited by his age, but he certainly filled a void that was there at the start of the race, giving the casual American fan a reason to be interested, and continuing a string of Tours in which Americans mattered in the end results.
My hat goes off to George Hincapie, who is completing his twelfth Tour out of thirteen starts. It is great to see a rider, particularly an American rider, serve as the “elder statesmen” of the bunch. He showed grit, courage, strength and intelligence in supporting his team, and in picking his own moments. Of course, it was disappointing to see him get so close to a stage win in the Alps, only to fall short, but it is great to see him keep on keeping on, even on a new team. I believe that his level-headedness played a solid role in the outstanding team performance, including five stage wins and several days in the lead. It is still not the same as seeing him with Discovery/USPS, but in the end, he rode his normal solid race, finishing a credible 35th, and just keeping on keeping on.
It was exciting to see two American teams start the race, and become players in the race. I began the Tour not really excited about either one. I considered Columbia to be re-incarnation of T-Mobile, which is predominantly a European team, and not really American. Garmin-Chipotle has felt like the JV little brother to the Discovery (turned Astana) team, and felt like they were only being given their chance in order to maintain an American presence. I am impressed with Jonathan Vaughters as a director sportif, for his commitment to clean racing, and indeed, because he seems to be taking the lessons learned in the Armstrong era, and continuing to apply them….because they are proven to work. In the end, though, even with only 4 US riders competing, I am sold on both of them. They became players in the overall, on individual stages, and in secondary jersey competitions. All four Americans (also including Danny Pate and Will Frischkorn) made noise in the race, and that is something to be proud of.
DRUGS
Perhaps for the first time in several years, I don’t feel as though the spector of drugs overwhelmed the race. Yes, there were a few positive tests, and one of them, Riccardo Ricco, was a potentially major player in the race. I said before that I had considered him suspect, and I guess, sadly, I was right. I feel good, though, that the tests seem to be working, and the race is gaining in credibility. I worry about teams pulling out of the sport, and with Barloworld dropping sponsorship, and Gerolsteiner looking for a new sponsor (not drug related, per se), I am concerned that the level of trust by the commercial world is suffering. I know that the best way to prove that cheaters are being caught is to actually catch them, but it also shows that some riders are still idiotic, and unwilling to really give in to clean sport, rather, they place their trust in advancing ways of cheating. I am happy, though, that I feel as if the race was not altered by a cheat, even if Riccardo Ricco did win two stages, and could have been a major player. I firmly believed that when I was watching the toughest stages, the riders were clean. They gave this appearance of being….human…of being at their limits, without one being substantially better than another, and without any sort of superhuman effort that belied logic. Maybe this made it a bit less spectacular, maybe you can call it parity, maybe you can say that the riders just didn’t have the class to attack like the champions of the past. For me, though, I appreciate the struggle, and the fact that I can truly believe in it. I like feel as though what I am watching is real, and that when I think something probably can or can’t be done within the human limits, I am right. I do believe that great champions still exist, and we will see them again. We will see superhuman-like rides, and enjoy them.
SUMMARY
There is a reason why this race is actually run. I know that I have changed my predictions several times after various junctures of this race, and that fortunes have little to do with rider’s reputations. This race is run on the roads, not on paper. (If you care to go back and check my picks, be my guest). I should congratulate Oscar Friere for earning the green jersey due to his strength and consistency. He beat out quality challengers in Hushovd and Zabel, and competed admirably against Mark Cavendish, who may be the better sprinter, but then, you have to be there every day, with nary an off day, and be willing to fight for the intermediate sprints, in order to win this competition. Bernhard Kohl was nowhere to be found when mentioning the contenders for the mountain prize, but he earned it. I am not sure that there was really a dominating mountain racer this year, with only Sastre’s attack on the Alpe d’Huez really being considered an exploit to be remembered. That being said, Kohl seized the opportunity, and won the competition. CSC’s domination of the team classification should have been foreseen. I know that I thought more about Caisse d’Epargne, and Arn mentioned Silence Lotto, both teams of which showed to be weak in the mountains. It was telling to note that the teams who performed well in the first half of the race (Caisse d’Epargne, Columbia & Garmin Chipotle) finished well down on the overall team classification, behind CSC, who dominated, and other less-heralded squads like AG2R and Gerolsteiner.
The Tour is just now over, and I am already thinking about next year. I have enjoyed watching this race. It was exciting, and close to the end, keeping my attention, which is a good thing. It produced a winner who I consider to be deserving, and who I respect. It held an American presence throughout, supporting my sense of jinjoism, and maintain a streak of over twenty years. I will still always wonder “what if”, as it pertains to the Astana team. Watching this, I know that Contador COULD have won again, and I know that Leipheimer COULD have played a significant role. The race would have been different….stronger teams battling each other, and different riders watching each other. Leipheimer may now have to concede that he will never win the Tour, as he advances in age, and newer, younger riders come in. That being said, it is always the riders who make the race, and I will tuck this year’s edition into my mental annals as being a good one, and I just have to wait now for twelve months to wait to see what happens next, in the never-ending story that is this great race.
